05/07/2012
CANADA: Government of Nova Scotia "invests" CAD 25 million in aquaculture company
The "investment" includes a CAD 16 million (USD 15.6 million) interest-bearing loan and a CAD 9 million (USD 8.8 million) forgivable loan through the Nova Scotia Jobs Fund and jobs. Of the CAD 16 million interest-bearing loan, CAD 4 million (USD 3.9 million) can be forgiven based on research, development and commercialization of innovation in the aquaculture industry.
18/10/2010
COLOMBIA: Subsidies to aquaculture, contingent on export
Here is the link to the aforementioned website (in Spanish) announcing the scheme:
And here the link to the full text of the scheme:
11/10/2009
CHILE: subsidies for the salmon farming sector
26/09/2009
NORWAY: fisheries subsidies in political parties' manifestos. Part I the Centre Party
I write "likely" on intent because one of the parties, the Socialist Left Party (Sosialistisk Venstreparti or SV), has pledged to voters that it would oppose the opening of the fishing grounds around the Lofoten and the Vesterålen islands for the exploitation of oil. At the time of writing this post negotiations among the concerned parties (Ap, SV and Sp) for the continuation of the coalition are still ongoing.
Fisheries, even though of very modest importance when compared to other economic sectors (e.g. energy) is still an importance constituency for most political parties in this country.
I went through the election programmes of some of the main parties looking for their pledges in fisheries and aquaculture. I must confess that it was a fishing (for subsidies!) expedition. Here is the catch for the Senterpartiet (Sp). This party, with farmers as its main constituency, participated in the previous government. These are some of the proposals
- With the help of increased "economic means" stimulate the growth in harvests and catches of populations of seals and whales so that stocks of edible fish can grow and pay due consideration to Norwegian hunting traditions and hunting environment.
As my translation might not reflect all the nuances of the Norwegian origional I copy here the Norwegian text:
"Gjennom økte økonomiske virkemidler stimulere til økt høsting og fangst på bestandene av sel og hval, for igjen å kunne øke bestandene av matfisk og ta vare på norske fangsttradisjoner og fangstmiljø."
- Uphold the "Råfiskloven" (whereby fishermen's sales organisations act as monopolies for the first sale of some fish species, see my post of 26 June 2009 "NORWAY: sales monopolies - supporting fishermen without subsidies?") and the "Deltakerloven" "Particpants law"),
Ensure a decentralised landing structure through the allocation of budgetary resources to the "Transport Regulation" and to landing sites where there is no other alternative to land [or deliver].
On aquaculture the Senterpartiet is proposing to:
- Establish a compensation mechanism for the cleaning and restoration of sites where serious (fish)illness has occurred. The cost of the compensation would have to be shared among, stakeholders, the state and insurance companies.
And concerning the strengthening of the competitiveness of the fishing industry:
- Abolish the yearly fee for the fishing vessels' register and the yearly fee to be paid by aquaculture companies to local authorities.
Oppose the introduction of a "control fee" for the fishery and aquaculture sectors.
The above proposals are noteworthy.
First of all the one related to encouraging, with the help of economic resources, the "harvest" of seals and whales. With the EU banning almost all trade in seal products it seems only logical that subsidies will be the only way to keep this "harvest" alive.
Furthermore, the Senterpartiet wants to maintain the monopoly of the sales organisations and the barriers to the entry in the profession as set-out in the "Participants' law (Deltakerloven). This is perfectly in line with the tradition of a party which has farmers as its main constituency.
The proposal to subsidise the construction of landing sites and the transport of fish is not a surprising one. Indeed, the previous government had launched a vast subsidy programme for fishing infrastructure (see my post of 21 March 2009 "NORWAY: hundreds of millions of krona for fisheries specific infrastructure").
Such policy explains Norway's defence at the WTO of subsidies to fisheries infrastructure. In Norway's written submission to the WTO fisheries subsidies negotiations (TN/RL/GEN/144 of 26/01/2007) we can read "OECD figures on transfers demonstrate that, on average, around 70 per cent of the transfers are used to finance either biological research and fisheries management systems or are measures financing infrastructure, such as harbours and fishing community installations. These are all measures that the majority of WTO Members agree should fall outside the scope of the new discipline."
So, it seems that according to Norway, subsidies to fishing infrastructure do not have negative impacts on fisheries resources.
Finally, it is more than clear that the Senterpartiet would have serious problems with the introduction of "cost-recovery" fisheries in the fisheries and aquaculture sector. The proposals to abolish fees and to oppose the introduction of a "control fee" are a clear illustration of this. This is in stark contrast with the positions of some key members of the WTO "Friends of Fish" group that consider that the non-recovery of fisheries management costs (including control) is a substantial subsidy.
Here are links with the proposals (in Norwegian) of the Senterpartiet for the fisheries sector:
http://produksjon.senterpartiet.no/article.php?articleID=34280
http://www.fiskebat.no/files/documents/spfiskeri.doc
06/08/2009
NORWAY: loan from government agency to ailing cod farming company
Innovation Norway (Innovasjon Norge in Norwegian) is a state owned company that “promotes nationwide industrial development profitable to both the business economy and Norway’s national economy, and helps release the potential of different districts and regions by contributing towards innovation, internationalisation and promotion.”
Here is the link to a webpage (in Norwegian) of Sponfish ASA announcing the loan:
http://www.sponfish.no/Sponfish+ASA+sikrer+finansiering+fra+Innovasjon+Norge.9UFRzU0T.ips
The financial report for the first quarter of 2009 can be dwonloaded from this page:
And here a link to a webpage in English presenting Innovation Norway:
http://www.innovasjonnorge.no/system/Global-toppmeny/English/
10/05/2009
NORWAY: communal subsidies to aquaculture
In the commune of Ballanagen, the local authorities have decide to grant a “soft loan” (interest free) amounting to NOK 400.000 to Ballangen Sjøfarm. The reimbursement of the loan will start after two years after the payment to Ballangen Sjøfarm with 5 years to effect the reimbursement.
Here is a link to a press article on this (in Norwegian):
http://www.fremover.no/lokale_nyheter/article4270381.ece
USA: more subsidies for catfish farmers
http://arkansasnews.com/2009/05/06/stimulus-money-available-for-catfish-industry/
And here is a link to the Act (see Sec. 102. Agricultural Disaster Assistance Transition. (d) 2008 Aquaculture Assistance):
http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/American_Recovery_and_Reinvestment_Act_of_2009/Division_A/Title_I
30/11/2008
NORWAY: cheaper salmon farming licenses in the North of Norway
The cost of the license will be 8 million Norwegian Krona, except for Finnmark in the North of Norway where the price for a license will be 3 million Norwegian Krona.
Ms Pedersen, who is from Finnmark, said that she was very happy to be able to make such announcenement.
Here is the offcial press release in English:
http://www.regjeringen.no/en/dep/fkd/Press-Centre/Press-releases/2008/new-licences-for-the-farming-of-salmon-t.html?id=535012
For those understanding Norwegian here is a link to news coverage by NRK, the Norwegian public broadcaster, of the announcement by Ms Pedersen:
http://www.nrk.no/nyheter/distrikt/nordland/1.6299730
29/11/2008
CHILE: subsidies for the salmon farming industry
Among the announced measures Ms Bachelet mentioned financial support for the industry that will take the shape of a new bank guarantee in the framework of the CORFO programme. The government’s sponsored bank guarantee is intended so that salmon farming companies can buy equipment such as recirculation systems, wellboats, waste management but also for to move cages in other sites.
The ceiling of the guarantee will be raised from 50% to 60% of the loans with a maximum of US$ 8 million per loan. The specific guarantee programme should cover a total amount of US$ 120 million. The government expects that the guarantee will generate a total investment of US$ 400 million. According to industry sources a substantial amount of the money will be used to change the production methods so as to eradicate the control the spread of and eventually eradicate the Infectious salmon anaemia (ISA) virus.
Other measures announced by Ms Bachelet concerned additional spending in Research and Development to finance, together with Norway and Canada, activities such as the conclusion of the sequencing of the salmon genoma. Other R&D initiatives include research to assess whether the ISA virus has affected other areas.
Finally Ms Bachelet suggested measures to make sure that “workers in the salmon farming industry do not pay the price as they are not guilty of what is going on in the industry”. Among the suggested measures Ms Bachelet mentioned a system to monitor the level of employment in the industry.
The full text of the speech of Ms Bachelet with the announcement of the measures can be found here:
http://www.prensapresidencia.cl/view/viewArticulosGeneral.asp?codigo=4967&tipo=Discurso